Description: This paper focuses on data-driven network effects as a purported driver of tipping—namely, the theory that both direct and indirect network effects, fuelled by data accumulation, reduce the cost of innovation for first movers and enable them to entrench their market positions and monopolize digital ecosystems. It argues that while this theory is intuitively appealing, it rests on a narrow and increasingly outdated understanding of how data functions in digital markets. Its continued dominance in policy discourse risks misdiagnosing the sources of market power and incentivizing regulatory overreach. Instead, competition law frameworks must adopt a more nuanced, evidence-based approach—one that accounts for the fluidity, heterogeneity, and strategic deployment of data, rather than treating it as a static source of monopolistic power. By doing so, regulators can better distinguish between genuinely exclusionary conduct and competitive, innovation-driven behaviour in the digital economy.
Attribution: Meghna Bal, Shweta Venkatesan and Mohit Chawdhry, Rethinking Data and Competition: A Critical Assessment of The Data-Driven Market Tipping Theory, May 2025, Esya Centre