Synopsis: This paper is to understand what the clash between traditional TV distributors and streaming platforms is really about, and if tighter regulation is indeed the answer to the problem or if a solution lies elsewhere.
Attribution: Megha Bahree. Streaming Platforms and the Call for a Level Playing Field. June 2022, Esya Centre.
Description: The report critiques a parliamentary committee's recommendation to extend statutory licensing to internet platforms in India, arguing it could undermine creators' rights and reduce the value of musical works due to piracy. It examines the potential impact of broadening Section 31D of the Copyright Act on creators' negotiating power and earnings, especially in the digital music consumption context. The article also explores international licensing reforms as alternatives that protect public interest and creators' income, suggesting a careful reassessment of statutory licensing's extension to digital streaming services.
Attribution: Noyanika Batta. Skewing the Pitch? Implications of expanding Section 31 D of the Copyright Act to internet broadcasters and online streaming services. June 2022, Esya Centre.
Public information suggests that the Enforcement Directorate, India’s primary economic law enforcement and intelligence agency, has begun inquiring whether cross-border crypto- asset activity would violate the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA), India’s capital controls legislation. International financial and monetary organizations such as the International Monetary Fund too have called on nations to amend their capital control laws to meet the challenges raised by the sale and purchase of crypto-assets. Empirical assessment of the matter, however, suggests that the link between crypto-assets and capital control evasion is overstated. In this context, the current paper seeks to assess whether crypto-assets can be accommodated within India’s foreign exchange framework. It also suggests ways to regulate the cross-border flow of crypto-assets without hampering the development of the Web3 economy in India.
Attribution: Meghna Bal, Mohit Chawdhry and Dr. Ajai Garg. Perspectives on the Intersection of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and the Indian Crypto-Market. May 2022, Esya Centre and IAMAI.
This report is part of a series published jointly with the Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI) that seeks to inform the public on the different policy dimensions of crypto-assets in India and the implications of regulatory decision-making on Web 3.0, blockchain, crypto-assets, non-fungible tokens and the metaverse. With this series, we aim to create a credible and trusted knowledge repository on the Indian crypto-market..
Decentralized exchanges (DEXs) have emerged as an important component of a broader crypto-business segment known as decentralized finance (DeFi) – an ecosystem where financial activities are carried out through smart contracts rather than intermediaries. On a decentralized exchange, rather than a centralized intermediary a smart contract or a protocol executes trades on behalf of customers.
The regulation of decentralized exchanges is necessary from the standpoint of consumer welfare as well as anti-money laundering concerns. These issues are more easily resolved in centralized exchanges, where there is an identifiable or real-world entity dealing with users. Decentralized exchanges on the other hand are designed to offer peer-to-peer trading services, where a smart contract rather than an entity facilitates transactions.
Understanding how to regulate decentralized exchanges and other DeFi services is important for decision-makers globally. In recent months, avenues have emerged towards the “regulability” of decentralized exchanges. This paper traces these pathways, to establish a starting point for regulators in India to approach the oversight of decentralized exchanges.
Attribution: Meghna Bal and Dr. Ajai Garg. Decentralized Exchanges: Regulatory Perspectives for India. April 2022, Esya Centre.
This report is part of a series published jointly with the Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI) that seeks to inform the public on the different policy dimensions of crypto-assets in India and the implications of regulatory decision-making on Web 3.0, blockchain, crypto-assets, non-fungible tokens and the metaverse. With this series, we aim to create a credible and trusted knowledge repository on the Indian crypto-market.
Description: The report examines how technological advancements have transformed competition in digital markets, focusing on the shift from price to non-price factors like innovation, quality, privacy, and security as key determinants of consumer choice. It highlights the challenges competition authorities face in measuring and evaluating these qualitative factors due to their subjective nature and potential jurisdictional overlaps with sectoral regulators. The report suggests solutions, including an integrated institutional framework and consumer surveys, to better assess non-price competition factors and ensure effective regulation in the rapidly evolving digital economy.
Attribution: Mohit Chawdhry. A Framework to Evaluate Non-Price Factors in Competition Regulation. March 2022, Esya Centre.
There are over 12,000 different types of crypto-assets, each providing unique services and functionalities. Despite this abundance, there is limited understanding about what these assets are. Moreover, these assets represent a nascent technology that is rapidly evolving. As such, defining and classifying them for the purpose of regulation presents a continuous challenge.
This paper attempts resolve these ambiguities by explaining what crypto-assets are and highlighting the positive and negative aspects of approaches taken by different institutions and jurisdiction to define and classify them. Further, it suggests a way to classify crypto-assets in India to enhance the ability of authorities to effectively regulate them.
Attribution: Meghna Bal and Dr. Ajai Garg. Crypto-Assets: What are they and how should they be classified in India? March 2022, Esya Centre and IAMAI.
This report is part of a series published jointly with the Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI) that seeks to inform the public on the different policy dimensions of crypto-assets in India and the implications of regulatory decision-making on Web 3.0, blockchain, crypto-assets, non-fungible tokens and the metaverse. With this series, we aim to create a credible and trusted knowledge repository on the Indian crypto-market.
Description: This report explores the rapidly evolving world of Non-fungible Tokens (NFTs), focusing on their technological basis, applications in various industries, and the legal landscape. It details the growth of NFTs, particularly in 2021, and discusses their use in art, gaming, and real estate, emphasizing the role of Indian developers. The primer also examines regulatory challenges, including the classification of NFTs under existing laws, intellectual property concerns, financial implications, and potential for money laundering. It offers recommendations for marketplaces and creators to navigate legal risks and suggests that clear guidance from authorities could foster innovation while protecting consumer interests and ensuring compliance.
Attribution: Mohit Chawdhry and Shivani Jha. NFTs: A Technological and Legal Primer. Issue No. 014, February 2022, Esya Centre.
Description: The report delves into cinema's transformative role in storytelling and societal impact, highlighting its universal appeal beyond the elitism of literature and high art. It examines cinema's power to influence, citing historical misuses like D.W. Griffith's racist narratives and Nazi propaganda films. Focusing on post-1947 India, the report explores how cinema became a pivotal medium for shaping national identity and reflecting the country's diverse socio-political landscape, offering insights into the complex interplay between film and the formation of community identities in the world's largest democracy.
Attribution: Vani Tripathi Tikoo and Akshat Agarwal. A Screen and A Mirror: Seven Decades of Indian Cinema. Special Issue No. 207, December 2021, Esya Centre.
Description: The report highlights the challenges and peculiarities of regulating digital platforms in multi-sided markets, emphasizing the need for competition regulators to adapt traditional antitrust tools for digital economies. It discusses the inadequacy of current market determination methods in capturing the complex dynamics of digital platforms, suggests incorporating platform typology and indirect network effects into analyses, and critiques the inconsistent use of qualitative factors in regulatory decisions. The report concludes with recommendations for legislative amendments and the establishment of guiding principles to better address the multi-faceted nature of digital platforms, urging objective, evidence-based approaches for determining market substitutability.
Attribution: Chawdhry, Mohit. Determining the Relevant Market for Digital Multi-Sided Platforms. Issue No. 013, December 2021, Esya Centre.
Description: The report outlines India's booming crypto industry, advocating for clear regulations to balance innovation with policy risks. It suggests adopting a safe harbour similar to internet intermediaries, analyzing international regulatory models, and recommending a co-regulatory approach involving SEBI, RBI, and the Ministry of Finance. Key proposals include defining crypto assets broadly, making exchanges the focal point of regulation, enhancing investor protection, and ensuring interoperability and safety in crypto transactions.
Attribution: Bal, Meghna; Venkatesan, Shweta and Ramdas, Varun. Regulating Crypto Assets in India. Monograph, November 2021. Observer Research Foundation and Esya Centre.
Description: The report emphasizes the importance of fostering innovation and maintaining competition in digital markets, similar to traditional markets. It highlights the challenges and peculiarities of digital markets, including scalability and influence on socio-political discourse, prompting global regulatory efforts. It critiques preemptive regulation and advocates for principles balancing oversight with innovation incentives, emphasizing the need for a holistic approach to competition, protection of novel business practices, and safeguarding innovation incentives.
Attribution: Bal, Meghna. First Principles for Competition Regulation in the Digital Economy. Issue No. 012, October 2021. Esya Centre
Description: This report highlights the increasing complexity and security concerns associated with global ICT supply chains. It discusses the impact of repeated cyber-attacks on supply chain vulnerabilities and outlines national security measures adopted by governments, such as the exclusion of Chinese vendors and app bans. The report emphasizes the need for a balanced approach, citing the evidence-based executive order issued by US President Joe Biden as a model for securing ICT supply chains without hindering innovation or trade. The brief concludes with an analysis of how the Indian cybersecurity framework aligns with these principles.
Attribution: Chawdhry, Mohit. Securing ICT Supply Chains: An Evidence Based Approach. Issue No. 011, August 2021, Esya Centre.
Description: This report delves into the extensive government surveillance programs in the United States and India, emphasizing the need for transparency in operations involving user data. It suggests recommendations for both governments and companies to enhance accountability, aligning with international principles on human rights in communication surveillance. Specific recommendations include legal reforms, granular data publication on surveillance requests, transparency on data audit processes, and collaboration with civil society. The report encourages U.S. companies to disclose more information related to government surveillance activities in India.
Attribution: Singh, Spandana and Bal, Meghna. Bridging the Transparency Gap: A Comparative Assessment of Surveillance-Related Transparency Efforts in the United States and India. Special Report, August 2021. Esya Centre and Open Technology Institute.
At the end of 2020, we conducted a study to understand the impact of technology on Indian retail in the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic. The culmination of this study has been published in the form of a book titled “The Future of Indian Retail: Stories from the Ground”.
The study documented the experiences of a diverse group of two dozen proprietors of small and medium enterprises that represent the domestic retail market. The book showcases these voices from the ground through their experiences of interaction with technology. More specifically, it provides perspective on how digital adoption helped sustain some segments of Indian retail and brought the country closer to the vision of an Aatmanirbhar Bharat, even amidst a crippling public health crisis.
The real-life stories documented in this publication highlight the entrepreneurial spirit and tenacity with which small entities tackled a fundamental disruption in their business due to the pandemic and the ensuing nationwide lockdown.
At the same time, the book provides valuable insights into the constraints that small enterprises face while adopting digital solutions. As we move towards the digital transformation of industry, dubbed ‘Industry 4.0’, it will be important for policymakers, business forums and industry associations to work together to overcome these challenges. For example, the improvement of underlying infrastructure and logistics mechanisms will require sustained and targeted investment. Similarly, business owners and employees will require skill and capacity building to effectively integrate digital solution into their operations.
Attribution: Esya Centre. The Future of Indian Retail: Stories from the Ground. New Delhi: Esya Centre, 2021.
Description: This report examines the evolving landscape of social media apps in India, particularly focusing on the surge of short-video apps. The widespread adoption of affordable smartphones and cheap data has led to a boom in internet users, primarily on mobile phones. Despite progress in bridging the urban-rural digital gap, a significant gender disparity persists. The paper explores the economic implications and societal challenges related to increasing online users, especially women, while emphasizing its unbiased research approach.
Attribution: Bahree, Megha. The Booming World of India’s Social Media Apps. Report 010, July 2021, Esya Centre.
Description: This report explores the impact of over-the-top (OTT) services on various sectors, emphasizing the advantages for consumers and businesses in going digital. It highlights the disruptive growth of internet-based services, especially in India's e-commerce sector, prompting calls for regulatory intervention to ensure a level playing field between digital and traditional businesses. The report argues against applying a legacy regulatory framework to digital services, proposing a two-pronged strategy of deregulation and institutional strengthening to foster fair competition and innovation.
Attribution: Chawdhry, Mohit. Levelling the Playing Field between Traditional and Digital Businesses. Report Issue 009, June 2021, Esya Centre.
Description: This report discusses the G20's evolution as a key global financial forum and its increasing focus on digital technologies. With India set to lead in 2023, it proposes a digital agenda, emphasizing trust-building and reducing the digital divide. Seven focus areas include digital corridors, infrastructure, MSME capacity building, open data, technical cooperation, regional collaboration, and frameworks for emerging technologies like AI and 5G. The aim is to foster international cooperation and inclusive development.
Attribution: Chawdhry, Mohit and Agarwal, Rohan. India’s G20 Presidency: Promoting Trust and Inclusivity in a Digital World. Report Issue 008, May 2021, Esya Centre.
This Policy Brief comes on the heels of reports that the Central Government has deferred the implementation of the latest Labour Codes, for want of state-level rules.
The latest labour law reforms of the Modi Government constitute four distinct Codes on (a) wages; (b) social security; (c) industrial relations; and (d) occupational, health, safety and working conditions. They were enacted to consolidate and update an obsolete framework.
While the proposed labour reform extends social security benefits to gig workers, its overall implications for the digital economy remains mixed.
The Policy Brief suggests that certain elements of the Codes, remain out of sync with key attributes of the digital economy, namely economies of scale, network effects and the importance of momentum.
Moreover, the new labour codes add rigidity, uncertainty and regulatory discretion in terms of hiring, work hours, labour management and firing costs—that will negatively impact the digital economy.
For instance, the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions (“OSHWC”) Code restricts employers from engaging contract labour in their ‘core’ activities.
The Policy Brief concludes with concrete suggestions which can improve the framework’s overall suitability for Digital India.
These suggestions include a strong focus on targeted income support for gig workers and specific measures to operationalise the delivery of benefits for gig workers under the Social Security Code.
Further, the Policy Brief suggests means to reduce regulatory discretion through i) adoption of clear standards and procedures; and ii) promotion of self-certification schemes for digital businesses.
Attribution: Deb, Sidharth and Chawdhry, Mohit. Aligning Labour Reforms with India’s Digital Aspirations. Policy Brief No. 206, April 2021, Esya Centre.
E-commerce gained significant attention at the 11th Ministerial Conference in Buenos Aires in 2017, where 71 member states released a Joint Statement affirming their intent to advance negotiations on trade related aspects of e-commerce under the WTO ambit. E-commerce was first recognised in global trade agreements at the Second Ministerial Conference in Geneva in 1998, where member states adopted a Declaration on Global Electronic Commerce and called to establish a Work Programme to examine issues of e-commerce related to trade).
The Work Programme was required to pay specific attention to the economic, financial and development needs of developing countries. India participated in the early rounds of discussion, raising key issues of intellectual property in e-commerce in its communication to the Council for Trade Related Aspects of International Property Rights in 1999. Its representative noted before the General Council the importance of e-commerce, specifically e-retail, for development. But he also stressed the importance of providing adequate policy space for developing states to establish domestic policies to govern e-commerce, and to build capacity among domestic MSMEs. These concerns were echoed by other developing states. As a result of this fundamental disagreement, progress under the Work Programme has been slow in the past two decades.
Recent years have seen a marked shift in the positions of several developing and Less Developed Countries, which are moving now toward a global compact on e-commerce. China, Saudi Arabia, Thailand and Kenya are just a few of the states to have signed and participated in discussions under the Joint Statement Initiative. Another prominent trend is the emergence of regional, interest-based groupings to promote the use of e-commerce for development. For instance the Friends of E-Commerce for Development, a group of developed and developing countries that include Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Australia, are working together to use e-commerce in a manner supportive of local industry and small enterprises. Further, regional trade agreements or RTAs increasingly incorporate clauses related to e-commerce. A recent study found that of 275 RTAs registered with the WTO, 75 contained at least one clause dealing explicitly with e-commerce. Yet India continues to oppose the formalisation of talks on e-commerce under the WTO. In its communication to the General Council prior to MC11, India advocated continuing talks under the existing Work Programme without altering its mandate. Statements from Indian representatives at the WTO show this opposition remains grounded in apprehension, that the entry of global retail brands would significantly hinder the development of domestic retail enterprises.
Failure to develop a more nuanced negotiation strategy at the WTO may have significant consequences for India. It risks being cut off from the preferential market access to be gained from participation in any multilateral or plurilateral agreement. This would hinder the flow of investments into the country, and its integration with the global supply chain. By choosing to completely distance itself from ongoing negotiations, India also loses the opportunity to shape global rules of digital trade. Historically, states that adopted global rules and technical standards have gained a significant first-mover advantage.
To negotiate more effectively at the WTO, India must first build sufficient local capacity, so that domestic products can effectively compete in global markets. It can learn from the experiences of nations such as Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand, which adopted a state-led approach to online retail development, and are able as a result to participate in deliberations under the Joint Initiative.
The focus of this analysis is online retail, a narrower sector than e-commerce. E-retail is concerned primarily with the online sale and purchase of goods, while e-commerce includes a wide range of services such as OTT platforms. A key impediment to India’s participation in global talks on e-commerce is the apprehension that its domestic retail sector will be unable to compete with large global corporations: this can be overcome through capacity building backed by the state, to let domestic retailers harness online retail opportunities, and eventually compete with foreign entities.
This paper attempts to define the broad contours of a specialised development agency that could undertake such capacity building effectively. The next section surveys the existing literature to identify key capacity deficits faced by Indian MSMEs in adopting digital technologies and e-retail. Section 3 outlines India’s approach to regulating e-commerce, contrasting it with the specialised bodies in other developing countries, and identifying certain principles of regulatory design that inform their functioning. Section 4 suggests how these principles could be applied within the Indian context.
Attribution: Mohit Chawdhry, “Digitalising Indian Retail: Capacity Building for a Global Context,” Issue No. 007, February 2021, Esya Centre.
Regulators around the world are scrutinising tech companies—the US, EU, India and other jurisdictions are filing competition lawsuits against large digital platforms, and the EU as part of its digital data strategy recently released drafts of the Digital Services Act, Digital Markets Act, and Data Governance Act on competition, content moderation, platform liability, and other aspects of digital technology. In India the government recently released draft frameworks for non-personal data regulation (the NPD Report) while a Joint Select Committee in Parliament is deliberating on the draft Personal Data Protection Bill, and the government indicates interest in a focus on developing artificial intelligence and related technologies.
Data is at the core of how digital platforms provide the products and services we use today, and is central to their functioning. It also has wider implications, and the transition from a paper-based system to a digital one offers multiple advantages not always related to technology: permitting better management of information, increasing security and efficiency, and providing information and insights to enable better decision making. Data is also being used at an unprecedented scale, in public service delivery, finance, healthcare, transportation, and marketing. A variety of stakeholders are collecting increasing volumes of data, whether personal, non-personal or a combination of the two.
Yet vast amounts of data are not useful in themselves without ways to make sense of them. This is what many emerging technologies do, from machine learning to the wide range of tools named ‘artificial intelligence’—they are methods to analyse and derive value from large volumes of data, and in many cases the way they work improves when given more diverse data to analyse. It is only possible to do so by ordering and organising data into specific formats depending on the intended use: this is the role of a database.
This paper examines how databases are afforded protection and details some key considerations for database regulation in India. It explores database protections in other jurisdictions, primarily the European Union and the United States. Section 1 defines a database, 2 explores the protections afforded by copyright law, 3 examines sui generis or standalone database protections, 4 explores protection by unfair competition laws, 5 examines the protections prevailing in India, and 6 lists emerging considerations and policy recommendations.
Attribution: Aishwarya Giridhar, “Database Regulation: Examining Existing Approaches and Considerations for India,” Special Issue No. 205, Feb. 2021, Esya Centre
